|
by Barbara Black
Studying how people relate to one another without face-to-face meetings
would seem to be an oxymoron or at least difficult to achieve
but Mia Lobel has designed and taught an online introductory prerequisite
course in Applied Human Sciences.
She had taught about 40 sections of the face-to-face version of the course,
or its equivalent, since 1985, but the idea of delivering AHSC 230: Interpersonal
Communications and Relationships online came to her when she joined a chatline
to pursue her interest in writing poetry. If something as personal as poetry
could bring a community of like-minded people together, she reasoned, why
not a course in interpersonal dynamics?
The purpose of the course, whether it is given in a classroom or by computer,
is to increase students self-awareness as communicators by exploring
issues of trust, perception, values clarification and diversity, plus the
participants learning and conflict management styles. Another goal
is to identify interpersonal limitations through feedback.
Lobel put the project together through a teaching development grant. She
described the e-course and gave a hands-on demonstration recently for about
20 fascinated Concordia teachers at a workshop organized by the universitys
Centre for Teaching and Learning Services.
The course time was distributed into two four-hour weekend sessions, followed
by nine three-hour weekly sessions, taught from 7 to 10 p.m. on a Wednesday
evening. Students and professors communicated with each other synchronously
in an online chat room.
One principal instructor (Lobel) and three facilitators staffed e-classroom.
The ratio of students to facilitators was seven to one. Twenty students
signed up for the course, and they all stayed with it to the end, which
Lobel takes as an endorsement. They came from all over the university; only
five of the 20 were in Applied Human Sciences programs.
They wrote weekly e-journals, which were e-mailed weekly to their group
facilitator and the instructor for evaluation and comments.
The real excitement, however, was the group discussion sessions, when the
electronic classroom became a continuous collector and disseminator of information
and insight. As many as 15 messages might be posted at the same time, and
as many as 300 would fly through the classroom in an hour. They
werent threaded, although they were time-stamped, numbered and archived.
One faculty member in the CTLS workshop asked how Lobel kept track of the
discussion. She answered that with practice, an instructor can keep track
of 30 or 40 conversations online. Eventually, everybody gets the flow,
she said. Its fairly intuitive.
In a social sciences course such as this, where the content is to a large
extent created by the students themselves, a lot of peer learning goes on,
Lobel said.
What we are realizing is that the e-classroom is not just a classroom,
it is also an observational tool that collects data, measures and quantifies
this data, and provides ongoing instantaneous feedback. This makes it a
significant tool for facilitation, intervention and training in group work.
The 20 students were broken down into three teams, and their messages were
colour-coded with red, blue or green ink. This made the discussion somewhat
easier to follow online, and although they continued to address the whole
group and the instructor, the students developed affinities with their team
members and their team facilitator.
Lobel and her colleagues are studying the project. In September, we
will conduct a matched study of a F2F (face-to-face) and an online AHSC
230 by keeping everything we can constant (i.e. the materials, time frames,
teaching assistants, and evaluation), and we will compare interaction, involvement,
the quality of the data generated by the students, and so on.
The Department of Applied Human Sciences is encouraged by the project, and
is likely to make these e-courses a permanent feature of the program, along
with the normal F2F sections. At the moment, we are looking at scalability,
Lobel said. We estimate that given adequate staff, we could teach
450 students a week in this manner, by having three sessions a day.
She invites interested professors to use her classroom, and will provide
the necessary training free of charge.
Susan Hogan, assistant director of the Executive Development program in
the John Molson School of Business, called the workshop a real eye-opener,
and said a colleague wanted to join in.
In an e-mail, Mathematics Professor Fred Szabo said, Mia Lobels
workshop demonstrated online teaching at its best. The design of the course
and the management of it engaged the students at a level of commitment and
enthusiasm that is rare to see. It also seems to have achieved its academic
goal.
The fact that the students were studying interpersonal relations without
actually meeting face-to-face was striking. At first it seemed contradictory.
On reflection, though, and with some hints from Mia, it became clear that
the interactive medium provides an environment for focusing on thoughts
and feelings in a rather academic way. Peoples looks and body language
play no role.
Given the explosion of interpersonal contacts provided by e-mail and
other online exchanges, I can see this aspect of human relations taken on
greater importance in our lives.
Teaching and technology workshops rouse interest
The Centre for Teaching and Learning
Studies has been holding a series of workshops featuring faculty teaching
and technology projects. As Heather McKenzie explained, its part of
an ongoing effort to exchange ideas, as technology transforms the learning
environment.
Basically, these sessions are intended to recognize the hard work
and dedication of our faculty members as they adopt and adapt technologies
to fit with visions that they have. In order to have any vision we need
some ideas of what is possible and forums for discussion amongst colleagues
with different levels of knowledge and experience. This is the first step.
These efforts are being supported by the Concordia-McConnell Pedagogy Technology
Project. The CTLS will offer more such workshops and forums, and will hold
a symposium in the fall to report on project activities.
|
|
|