  | 
      | 
     
         
     | 
      | 
  
   
    | 
        
         
       
     | 
     
      by Barbara Black 
       
      After 30 years of teaching, Accountancy Professor George Lowenfeld can stand 
      in front of a classroom of 50 students and tell within 10 minutes 
      who is caught up in the lesson and who has already fallen by the wayside. 
      I can see it in their eyes. 
       
      Not any more  at least, not in the executive course in investment 
      management hes teaching to a class split between Toronto and Montreal. 
      Lowenfeld, who is also director of executive programs in the John Molson 
      School of Business, has had to learn some new teaching techniques.  
       
       Lowenfeld is one of five faculty members teaching the first class 
      of mid-career executives in this elite course, the flagship offering by 
      the Goodman Institute of Investment Management, which leads to the Masters 
      of Business Administration (Investment Management option) or Masters 
      in Investment Management, and is designed for CFA (certified financial analyst) 
      candidates. 
       
      Seven students take the course from a teleconferencing room in Torontos 
      Eaton Centre office complex, and 16 students from the Arts and Science Learning 
      Centre media lab on the fourth floor of Concordias Hall Building. 
       
       
      The two classes met by video link weekly, Tuesdays from 7 to 
      10 p.m. and Saturdays 8 a.m. to 2 p.m., but never met in the flesh until 
      last Monday, when the Toronto participants came to Montreal for an intensive 
      week of wind-up activities. 
       
      Its a fascinating little exercise, Lowenfeld admitted. 
      For starters, the teacher cant look into the students eyes, 
      because he cant see them. He (or she) sometimes cant tell when 
      he is being seen by the students, either, since the camera may be showing 
      the teacher or the smart board or both at any one time. That means the teacher 
      has to stay put, not roam at will around the classroom.  
       
      Despite not seeing members of his audience, Lowenfeld had to develop new 
      ways of deciding when to stop talking and start trying to elicit questions. 
      Both teacher and students had to get used to using the microphone, because 
      their voices had to be clearly heard in the other city. 
       
      A conventional Powerpoint presentation makes their heads spin, Lowenfeld 
      said, because they are watching the presenter as well as his smart board 
      on a TV monitor.  
      You have to bring up the whole page, the lettering has to be bigger, 
      and you have to be aware of the speed at which elements come up on the screen. 
      Were also using new technology to set and mark exams. 
       
      Another requirement is that the teaching material has to be prepared well 
      in advance  no winging it as the course progresses. 
       
      Although he calls himself a big idiot for volunteering for such 
      an experiment at this stage of his career, Lowenfeld is proud of the JMSBs 
      achievement in e-learning, and feels we can do even better. 
      The next stage is to enrich the live segments with prepared courseware, 
      much in the manner of the successful Global Aviation MBA. 
       
      Education Professor Dennis Dicks, who is also an e-learning consultant for 
      the business school, put together a team, including a video-training consultant, 
      who guided Lowenfeld, his colleagues and the students through this exercise. 
       
       
      Dicks said, Experience again demonstrates that using teaching technologies 
      to change classroom dynamics involves a lot of preparation, ideally with 
      skilled collaborators. Faculty in the innovative Investment Management program 
      responded responded admirably to this challenge.  
       
       
       
       | 
      | 
      |